Status Card

Status Card — V10

August 08–September 4, 2026 | Cross-Asset

Status Card V10 continues V9’s pressure-to-expression mapping. During this period, the distinction between market domains becomes clearer: crypto maintains frequent kinetic expression, Gold expresses tension selectively, and SPX shows widespread macro alignment with more limited price expression.

The central observation is divergence in how detected pressure is expressed across domains.

Crypto — Persistent Kinetic Expression

The V10 crypto window contains 45 alerts across BTC, ETH, and SOL. Of these, 38 were evaluated and seven remained open at the review cutoff.

Within the evaluated set, both the 2σ price-move criterion and the realized-volatility p95 criterion were recorded in 38 of 38 observations. Median recorded lead time was approximately 8.5 hours.

This continues the kinetic expression profile observed in V9: crypto alerts remain closely associated with measurable movement and volatility conditions in the completed observation windows. The seven open alerts leave the period’s outcome assessment incomplete.

Gold — Selective Expression Without 2σ Expansion

Gold produced seven evaluated alerts. Five were classified as expressive hits, while two were classified as no expression. Realized-volatility p95 conditions appeared in five of seven evaluations, but no evaluation met the 2σ price-move criterion.

DXY and Treasury-yield shock flags each appeared in five observations, while macro alignment appeared in three. Median recorded lead time was 30 hours among the five observations with measurable lead time.

Gold therefore continues the expression-quality distinction developed in V9. An expressive outcome can occur through the volatility criterion without a 2σ price move, while other pressure observations remain without recorded expression.

The August 21 and August 28 alerts remained unresolved / no_expression after evaluation. These observations preserve the limits of the period’s expression; they are completed evaluations, not pending alerts.

S&P 500 — Systemic Pressure with Selective Price Expression

SPX produced 66 evaluated documents, representing 48 distinct observations after accounting for 18 matching record pairs.

Across those 48 observations, VIX-shock and macro-alignment flags appeared throughout the set, while Treasury-yield shock flags appeared in 30 of 48. Realized-volatility p95 conditions appeared in 17 of 48 observations, but none met the 2σ price-move criterion.

Volatility expression was concentrated late in the period: 16 of the 17 p95 hits belonged to alerts created on August 26–28. Median recorded lead time among the 17 measurable observations was approximately 2 hours.

V10 therefore sharpens the distinction between SPX’s systemic pressure profile and kinetic price expression. Macro conditions were widely represented, while the volatility criterion was met selectively and the 2σ criterion remained unmet.

SPX observations may cluster within the same stress episode. Removing matching records improves the count, but does not make the remaining observations independent statistical trials.

PGI & Reflective Flow — Quiet and Selective

The filtered V1 PGI / Reflective Flow record contains one observation during the V10 window: SPX on August 13 at 14:00 UTC, with PGI ≈ 0.4225 and λF ≈ 0.5563.

Its Reflective Flow state was neutral. No active or confirm state appears in the selected records.

Within this monitoring view, V10 presents a quiet and selective PGI profile. The observation shows a PGI rise without a corresponding active or confirmed Reflective Flow state.

Cross-Asset Interpretation — Divergent Expression Across Domains

V9 established pressure-to-expression mapping as the central observational question. V10 makes the differences between domains more visible.

These patterns support reading each domain through its own expression profile. A pressure observation does not carry the same market meaning across crypto, Gold, and SPX, and an expression hit does not necessarily imply a 2σ price move.

The progression from V9 — Pressure-to-Expression Mapping to V10 — Divergent Expression Across Domains therefore reflects a more specific question: “How does the expression of detected pressure differ from one market domain to another?”

Methodological Note

Counts use UTC alert-creation dates. Four crypto records and one Gold record created on August 7 are excluded. Outcome figures summarize recorded evaluator results; open alerts are excluded from outcome denominators. Lead-time medians use non-null values, including nine zero-hour crypto observations that do not represent advance warning. The results describe this observation window and do not establish independent predictive accuracy or scientific validation of λF.